Yes! As we developed and validated the Whole Person Assessment, we confirmed that the self-reported scores by members are reliably predicted by manager, direct report, and peer ratings. For example, members who report higher levels of cognitive thriving are 3x more likely to be rated highly in strategic planning by their manager, and members who report a higher degree of social connection with others are 3x more likely to be rated highly on relationship-building by their manager. One of our partners used BetterUp to support their sales leaders, and as the Whole Person Model reported a 20% increase in productivity, these employees had also generated 20% more revenue for the organization.

Additionally, the anonymous, developmental nature of the Whole Person Assessment removes any motivation to fake or inflate scores, which can occur with assessments that are used for selection purposes. The Whole Person Model includes internal mindsets and perceptions that can best be assessed by the person directly, and even with behaviors that are observable by others, the person’s self-perception of their capabilities influences how they do behave and is a developmental tool that coaches use to spark reflection and growth. Our manager feedback tool and 180/360 assessments can tangibly bolster self-reported data and help the individual identify blind spots, and our coaches are trained to help identify the best time to initiate these additional assessments (when key mindsets have been established to invite constructive feedback and take action to change).